dts Posted March 18, 2011 Share Posted March 18, 2011 This is a new one on me route was EHAM ANDI1S ANDIK UN873 TUSKA N873 VES N607 AAL N866 NEGIL N15 BODRI UN15 VAVOS UT89 OGVOR UM857 ROPSU M6 BISRO EFKT this appeared when i tried to select runway 16 LLZ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aivlasoft Posted March 18, 2011 Share Posted March 18, 2011 Hi Dave, there is a simple "TURN RIGHT" missing in the Navigraph data for the transition "L". Since the difference between current track and next track is 180° EFB cannot determine to which side the turn goes. In such a situation EFB takes the "left side" turn as a default which is unfortunately wrong in this situation. Before: " ... HDG 113 INTERCEPT RADIAL 158 TO FIX DME09" After: " ... TURN RIGHT HDG 113 INTERCEPT RADIAL 158 TO FIX DME09" See the result below.[attachment=0]EFKT_LLZ16_L.jpg[/attachment] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dts Posted March 18, 2011 Author Share Posted March 18, 2011 Urs The only way for me to continue with this was to shutdown the Displayunit and it would then load back up with the last route and not select rwy 16, it didnt show any profile, it remained on the warning box Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG_Flyer Posted March 18, 2011 Share Posted March 18, 2011 Dave, The default Navigraph data gives me the same inability to draw the profile as it does for you. Editing the TRANSITION L line in the EFKT.TXT file as Urs mentioned to add the "TURN RIGHT" token prior to "HDG 113" does cause the profile to be displayed as in Urs' screenshot. You would have to press the "reset airport data cache" button on your DU Settings as well. Regards, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dts Posted March 18, 2011 Author Share Posted March 18, 2011 Happy with changing the text, just info really as most people probably wouldnt have a clue ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG_Flyer Posted March 18, 2011 Share Posted March 18, 2011 Dave, If it is possible to diagnose and auto-correct such missing bits of procedure data, then Urs would (attempt to) do so. However seeing as such a missing directive could come anywhere in the data, this might be a tall order to accomplish. It might take a request to Navigraph for them to study their parser and see if anything could be done in that area. Regards, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts