jackharpenden

Hello, If you're utilising the latest AIRAC cycle then this might be your problem - viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1065 Go back to Navigraph and download revision 2 of the AIRAC and you're problem should be fixed. Jack

Thanks Urs! Jack

I have the same problem too. Although everything on the DisplayUnit seems to appear correctly, despite the messages. Jack

Hello, While browsing the Avsim forums I found this - http://forum.avsim.net/topic/372470-aiv ... efb-works/ I'm not a Prepar3d user, but it seems someone can make EFB work with it. Thanks, Jack

When I've got some decent time on my hands to thoroughly understand and learn the US procedures I might try some VFR on Vatsim state side, and eventually may then give PilotEdge a go. Thanks for the response! Jack

Hi Keith, It's nice to see the creator of the network here to accurately answer questions. Looking at your VATSIM stats, you've been quite an active member in the past and you're still active on the Vatsim Forums, which is nice to see. Just something to ask, as from what you've said I'm quite interested in PilotEdge. I've always felt that there's really not enough VFR/GA flying on Vatsim, which is a real shame, but at the same time I'm guilty myself of mostly flying "big-tin". Does/will PilotEdge only every cover parts of the United States? As a progressing PPL trainee in the UK, the procedures are somewhat different over the pond, and what I'd love to be able to practice is the UK VFR procedures, where all parties know properly what they're doing. Thanks, Jack

It's a shame Navigraph can't just sort it out. If it's easy enough for users to modify the navdata then surely for them it's as easy as anything! Oh well, I guess Navigraph do a bit of a service for us all - otherwise we'd never have even recent data. Jack

Actually, yes, I'd forgotten about that. It may well be fixed. I'll try it later today. Sorry for causing confusion! - I'll let you know whether it works. Jack

I've also had the same problem with that same bgl file for Kiev. Jack

Hi Brad, See this - viewtopic.php?f=5&t=923#p5661 Not a particularly old post! Hope this helps, Jack

Probably, yes. Did IVAO users always see all traffic before the latest EFB version? If so, perhaps the changes made to improve the visibility of traffic in the latest version has benefited VATSIM client users but not IVAO users. It might be a good point to switch to VATSIM, it's much better anyway! Thanks, Jack

Since the last build I haven't spotted any missing VATSIM traffic at all - even when flying the NGX, where previously I have had it show nothing at all. All working well for me Thanks, Jack

This is also something I'd like to know. I've seen it on so many occasions yet I don't know what its significance is. Jack

There's no need for it to be equal. I've always just left EFB's setting on unlimited and just changed vis ranges in FSInn. I vary the range set in FSInn depending on how much traffic is in the area. i.e. If I'm going long haul across the atlantic (at times other than Cross the Pond ) then I'll have it set to 100, but in a terminal environment I'll set it to 20/30. It's always nice to be kind to the VATSIM servers too, as I think officially they recommend leaving it at 20. Thanks, Jack

There seems to be a more serious problem here. Ticking the box for kph just appears to make the speeds look plausible, but they're still wrong. I'll be posting in the Beta Tester forums later with some findings. Thanks, Jack