Jump to content

viperxbr

Members
  • Posts

    66
  • Joined

  • Last visited

viperxbr's Achievements

  1. Thanks Urs! No I don't really fly there often because of the lack of scenery. But this one time for FNO last week, Cleveland was the departing airport and hence, found this issue. Cheers, Todd.
  2. Anyone tried this scenery in EFB? I get double 24L runways instead of a 24L and 24C. This causes EFB to crash with an Unhandled Exception. It scans fine in the new PMDG's EFB map but Aivlasoft just yaks.
  3. Hey Oskar, Thanks for the explanation and fix for this issue! I had no idea about the displaced threshold either. Learn something new everyday! Cheers, Todd.
  4. Just an FYI. Posted on Navigraph forum as well. https://forum.navigraph.com/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=8740
  5. Hey Urs, I'm starting to really enjoy the new version. It took a while but it's starting to grow on me now. Just a couple of little things that would be nice to have in a future update. 1. Including SIDS/STARS in the lower Flight Plan field. I use this area to copy/paste to other tools(ie vPilot, ACARS, etc..) when setting up my flight. It was very handy in v.1. It would be nice to have that capability back in v.2.(Se pic below. Notice the SID "LOTO3Q" is not included in the highlighted summarised flight route below. It would be nice to have these included again.) 2. This one may have been mentioned many times. Including the online ATC in order of sequence would be nice to have again. Maybe just having it in order on the Radio page would be nice. 3. This is more of a bug I believe. I cannot "Set FPL" when selecting a RWY/SID in the DEP tab when P3D is not loaded or even on the the scenario page. It has to be fully loaded and on the ground in order to "Set FPL". I can do it all on the ARR page without the sim running. Thanks again Urs! Cheers!
  6. The update worked for me. Thanks for the quick turn around Urs!
  7. Just wanted to add there are two other files where scenery is listed: \ProgramData\Lockheed Martin\Prepar3D v4\add-ons.cfg \Users\user\AppData\Roaming\Lockheed Martin\Prepar3D v4\add-ons.cfg Get these added some way and we should be good.
  8. Wow! That's pretty sad but not surprising. You get what you pay for...or don't pay for in this case.
  9. Hey Urs, I do remember, a while back, I posted an issue with a large GS variance between EFB and the latest IvAp (IVAO) client. Here are the previous posts: http://www.aivlasoft.com/support/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=1160&hilit=ground+speed http://www.aivlasoft.com/support/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=870&hilit=ground+speed I'll get back to you after doing some TAS comparisons. I never thought of obtaining those readings... ***Update: A couple of tests. Online AC #1: EFB reading= 422kts (EFB set to GS) Actually: GS 431kts TAS 447kts IAS 277kts Online AC #2: EFB = 439kts (EFB set to GS) Actual: GS 447kts IAS 292kts So far it doesn't look like it's even TAS on EFB. I'll ask for more tonight. Cheers, Todd
  10. Hey Urs, I've tried what you suggested. I've noticed that it is actually much closer to the actual speed of others than originally stated. It seems both IAS and GS on EFB is averaging around 15-20kts more than what the other online pilots are doing. For example: DAL2022 was seeing a GS of 535 and on the EFB AC monitor was reading it as 553kts. Around the same difference for the IAS. So it must of been one of the patches of vPilot that may have reduced the speed differences... not sure. But it has been awhile since I really looked into it. Thanks, Todd.
×
×
  • Create New...