witto737
-
Posts
13 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by witto737
-
-
Hello Urs. whilst i fully appreciate your comments what i do not understand is this, these path boxes were their, otherwise i could of not configured the P3D path originally when i configured the scenery path, when i decided to add P3D to EFB i clicked on P3D button, the relevant path boxes for P3D were then shown and the paths were configured, now the DP tells me the scenery path is incorrect, so how do I get to change the PATH ????......
Richard
-
Hi Urs, I have already included a screenshot in my previous posts of the DP options under simulators, and as you can see the installation folder and scenery cfg folder options are no longer there, which is a complete mystery as they were there originally otherwise i would not of been able to use FSX prior to P3D.
This is very annoying to sat the least.
Richard
-
Hi Jerry, having just obtained P3D, i went to the data provider settings and clicked on the choose sim button, then the dialogue box for the scenery.cfg path appeared, i chose what i thought was the correct path, obviously it is not as the DP can not locate the file, now this dialogue box is no longer there, its vanished, so i can not alter the path, i can only assume that you only have one shot at getting the path correct??, its very fustrating. Just a thought, what would clicking the set Default Button do??.
Richard
-
Can anyone provide an answer please????.
Richard
-
Hi, many thanks for the reply, however as you can see from the screenshot there is no 3rd box, only the flightplan folder location box.
Richard
-
Hi guys, i have just added P3D to EFB, however i think the path to the P3D scenery.cfg file is incorrect as the Data Provider can not locate it, can someone please tell me how i can get back to change the path within the Data Provider Settings, all that is there in the simulator section now is the options for FSX and P3D, and below that the paths for each of their respective flight plan folders, no other file path options appear??.
-
Hi Edwin, jesus i looked and looked at the runways txt file and clearly the answer was staring me in face, but just couldnt see it, I have revised the file and now EGSS show the correct indentifiers 04 and 22. just one question though, why would the file need still require 05 and 23 to work?.
Again my sincere thanks Edwin
Richard
-
i have say i am very surprised at having no response to this, i have spent the last 4 hours checking all the Nav files, runway files deleting 05 and 23 from them, rebuilding everthing and still without success, to put it mildly this is driving me nuts!!!!.
Would really appreciate some assistance here guys.
Thanks in appreciation.
-
Where exactly does EFB get its airport data from ?????.
-
As you may of gathered i use both to produce my flightplans, PFPX to produce the plan etc and transfer it into EFB, brilliant!, until i wanted to fly from EGSS, stansted to LSZH, Zurich, PFPX has produced the flightplan departing from runway 22, it shows runways 22 and 04. now when load the same plan into EFB i get the following messages in the DataProvidor.
Navigation Data Ident 04 at airport EGSS could not be assigned to simulator runway.
the same appears for runways 04C, 22 and 22C respectivley.
Available runways for this airport are 05, 23.
Now NATS charts show the runways as 04 and 22, this tells that PFPX is assigning the correct runways and EFB isnt, my Airac is current and applied to both PFPX and EFB.
Can anyone provide a solution to this please??.
-
Thanks for the reply, albeit not very helpful considering i am looking to purchase the product, if potential customers can not use the Demo how do you expect them to want the the full version ??, I am running windows 8.1 which has Net4 built in.
-
I have downloaded the latest version of EFB directly from the website looking to use the trial version, however when i open the Data Provider, with admin rights i get the following event in the event logs.
Source: Application Error
Date: 19/04/2016 15:00:49
Event ID: 1000
Task Category: (100)
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: PC-Gaming
Description:
Faulting application name: AivlaSoft.Efb.DataProvider.exe, version: 1.6.8.0, time stamp: 0x56c5ffaa
Faulting module name: KERNELBASE.dll, version: 6.3.9600.16384, time stamp: 0x52158f2d
Exception code: 0xe0434352
Fault offset: 0x00013d67
Faulting process id: 0xbb0
Faulting application start time: 0x01d19a43c1bcec48
Faulting application path: C:\Program Files (x86)\AivlaSoft\EFB\AivlaSoft.Efb.DataProvider.exe
Faulting module path: C:\Windows\SYSTEM32\KERNELBASE.dll
Report Id: 1e992c49-0637-11e6-82c4-f46d04d8a288
Faulting package full name:
Faulting package-relative application ID:
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
<System>
<Provider Name="Application Error" />
<EventID Qualifiers="0">1000</EventID>
<Level>2</Level>
<Task>100</Task>
<Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords>
<TimeCreated SystemTime="2016-04-19T14:00:49.000000000Z" />
<EventRecordID>111246</EventRecordID>
<Channel>Application</Channel>
<Computer>PC-Gaming</Computer>
<Security />
</System>
<EventData>
<Data>AivlaSoft.Efb.DataProvider.exe</Data>
<Data>1.6.8.0</Data>
<Data>56c5ffaa</Data>
<Data>KERNELBASE.dll</Data>
<Data>6.3.9600.16384</Data>
<Data>52158f2d</Data>
<Data>e0434352</Data>
<Data>00013d67</Data>
<Data>bb0</Data>
<Data>01d19a43c1bcec48</Data>
<Data>C:\Program Files (x86)\AivlaSoft\EFB\AivlaSoft.Efb.DataProvider.exe</Data>
<Data>C:\Windows\SYSTEM32\KERNELBASE.dll</Data>
<Data>1e992c49-0637-11e6-82c4-f46d04d8a288</Data>
<Data>
</Data>
<Data>
</Data>
</EventData>
</Event>Anyone help with this please???
P3d scenery.cfg location error
in EFB v1 (Read only, no longer supported)
Posted
Thanks Urs. tell you what, since i installed EFB i have had so many runway runway issues, wrong indent number etc and the the process to correct these is so long winded and very often does not succeed in the right result, and with this latest issue, where your advising a complete uninstall and reinstall to correct another issue in my my opinion sucks!!!!. You have the basis of a very good program, albeit the transitions can be way off, its just a shame that their are so many general issues listed here on the forum, of course i accept that you can never release a perfect piece of software, there will always be issues that you had had experienced whilst in Beta mode, so i am sticking with Flightsim Commander, i have NEVER HAD AN PROBLEM with it.
Richard