Juergen2 Posted May 27, 2020 Share Posted May 27, 2020 Hi, I am getting several localizer warning messages at standard (not payware) airports, e.g. LOWG (Graz): NO LOC available EINN (Shannon): LOC outdated (ILS 24) I have the newest AIRAC (2006) cycle from Navigraph in P3Dv4.5 as well as EFB2. How can I correct these airports? Thanks for help Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lonewulf47 Posted May 27, 2020 Share Posted May 27, 2020 18 minutes ago, Juergen2 said: Hi, I am getting several localizer warning messages at standard (not payware) airports, e.g. LOWG (Graz): NO LOC available EINN (Shannon): LOC outdated (ILS 24) I have the newest AIRAC (2006) cycle from Navigraph in P3Dv4.5 as well as EFB2. How can I correct these airports? Thanks for help Please read here: https://forum.aivlasoft.com/topic/4264-why-are-ils-approaches-not-showing/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juergen2 Posted May 27, 2020 Author Share Posted May 27, 2020 Thanks Oskar I now understand Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juergen2 Posted May 27, 2020 Author Share Posted May 27, 2020 Hi again Oskar, So i went to aero.sors website and downloaded the Worldupdate, which is to correct data for Europe. I checked EINN (Shannon) again and the same message appeared (LOC outdated). Now obviously there is a discrepancy between Navigraphs 2006 AIRAC and the now updated? P3Dv4.5 data. Is there a way I can check/compare both datasets/files to determine which database produces the error/message? I don't know if this is a EFB2 issue or if I should go to aero.sors website. Thanks for reply Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lonewulf47 Posted May 27, 2020 Share Posted May 27, 2020 Hi Jürgen, Did you re-run the DbBuilder after updating the default scenery by SORS' ? My default ILS/LOC for EINN show all correct values: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juergen2 Posted May 27, 2020 Author Share Posted May 27, 2020 Quote Hi Oskar, The message disappeared after I "CREATED A NEW DATABASE". I did not run a new database before! However, you show a LOC 06 & 24 approach with ISE & ISW localizer. I have a LOC DME 06 & 24 with the SHA VOR. I show the same data for the ILS 06 & 24 approach as you. https://www.flickr.com/photos/141330124@N05/shares/9p2R0i Do you have a different simulator than I (P3Dv4.5)? Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juergen2 Posted May 27, 2020 Author Share Posted May 27, 2020 Oskar, I deleted the above screenshot by mistake: https://www.flickr.com/photos/141330124@N05/shares/Lr3M94 Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lonewulf47 Posted May 27, 2020 Share Posted May 27, 2020 Hi Juergen, No panic😀 All is ok. Of course I also see the VOR/DME 06 and 24 approaches. Obvioulsy the Navigraph Database does not have the LOC Approaches for RWY 06 and 24 explicitly issued. This is no mistake, just another way of depicting approaches. An ILS approach of course also includes a LOC approach. While LIDO/NavDataPro also depicts each LOC approach, Jeppesen/Navigraph does not. But of course both approaches are nevertheless flyable: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juergen2 Posted May 28, 2020 Author Share Posted May 28, 2020 Hi Oskar, Understand - I guess I can either fly the ILS or LOC approach to runway's 06 and 24, which Jeppsen/Navigraph does not list separately. Thanks again for great help Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.