mroschk Posted November 10, 2018 Share Posted November 10, 2018 Hello, is there any reason, why the Holding in EFB is different from the Holding in real world charts (Lido)? I just added a Picture to compare r/w holdings from EDDP 08L LUKO08 Arrival with EFB. Btw: Did i miss something or how can i set the CRS for Nav1/Nav2 ? ( just a question ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lonewulf47 Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 Hi ??? (please observe the Forum Rules) Sorry, your inquiry got somehow "lost" as we were busy at the traditional FlightSim Weekend in Hergiswil/Switzerland. The depiction of a holding is dependent on the information that we can derive from the respective ARINC data. If it is clearly defined as a HOLDING PATTERN, we depict it with the information provided. If it is marked with an "ENROUTE HOLDING" flag only, we can only depict it as a standard Right Holding Pattern on the last inbound leg. Many of the holdings at the end of aMAPt are unfortunately coded this way. For the specific holding you mentioned here we will have to check with the ARINC database, which of the two cases is used. Nevertheless of course there is always also the possibility that something went wrong. We will check and be back in due time. Thanks for your understanding forthe delayed answer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mroschk Posted November 13, 2018 Author Share Posted November 13, 2018 Hello, a deayed answer is not a Problem at all. Yes i thought lso the quality of your generated charts con only be so good the the Datasource is. About the ??? ... i would refer you to the actual Data Security Rules, sorry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aivlasoft Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 Each forum has its own rules. Go and have a look at others. I doubt that you are allowed to post there if you neglect their rules. The GDPR (DSGVO) does not prohibit that you sign your post with your real first name, and to be honest, what is the problem if you sign your post with your real first name? We do not request your family name, but just your first name. We don't do this just to keep you busy, we like to talk to humans and not just to unknown and virtual beings. You want us to support you, so it's just a matter of respect to comply with our rules. Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mroschk Posted November 14, 2018 Author Share Posted November 14, 2018 But you also did not sign your Post with your real name, or should "Urs" be your first Name? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aivlasoft Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 You won't believe it, but this is indeed my first name. Don't blame me for that, it was the idea of my parents to give this short, but typical Swiss first name. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mroschk Posted November 14, 2018 Author Share Posted November 14, 2018 really .. unbeleavable short ... i set mine also in the signature and hope we can come back to the important things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pasterke Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mroschk Posted November 19, 2018 Author Share Posted November 19, 2018 what should "?" mean "pasterke" ??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mroschk Posted November 22, 2018 Author Share Posted November 22, 2018 @aivlasoft: are there maybe any news? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lonewulf47 Posted November 22, 2018 Share Posted November 22, 2018 1 hour ago, mroschk said: @aivlasoft: are there maybe any news? Hi Matthias, The path terminator of the latest dataset by NavDataPro Cycle 1812 confirms a Left Holding at SONDU inbd crs 081°. This is correctly depicted here. I do not have a Navigraph Dataset at hand. If the latter does not use the same path terminator then the holding would be drawn as a Standard Right Pattern. LIDO and Jeppesen do not always use the same coding priciples, but this is beyond our scope. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mroschk Posted November 23, 2018 Author Share Posted November 23, 2018 Hello, yes, the SONDU Holding is correct, but as you can see in the first Post, the LUKOP Holding is wrong. But i know, you aivlasoft can only produce good and correct charts, if the Datasource is good and correct. Matthias Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lonewulf47 Posted November 24, 2018 Share Posted November 24, 2018 3 hours ago, mroschk said: Hello, yes, the SONDU Holding is correct, but as you can see in the first Post, the LUKOP Holding is wrong. But i know, you aivlasoft can only produce good and correct charts, if the Datasource is good and correct. Matthias The LUKOP Holding is only defined as Holding IAF on the AppTrans without specific Holding Inbound and turn direction. Therefore EFB v2 depicts it as a Standard Right Pattern on the following course. Unfortunately we do not have full access to the entire Holding Database. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mroschk Posted November 24, 2018 Author Share Posted November 24, 2018 Hello, ok i undertand. Btw.: What is "entire Holding Database" and why have you no access to this DB? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lonewulf47 Posted November 24, 2018 Share Posted November 24, 2018 15 minutes ago, mroschk said: Hello, ok i undertand. Btw.: What is "entire Holding Database" and why have you no access to this DB? We are retrieving data from the standard ARINC 424 Database. The Holdings are in kind of a sub-database which is not part of this Standard Database. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mroschk Posted November 24, 2018 Author Share Posted November 24, 2018 Thanks for the fast Answer. So i think it is a questin about € to get access to the sub-database for the Holdings? If yes, i am willing to pay a little more to get the correct Hoödings, because they are sometimes important to know. (Btw: i want to say that EFB is AMAZING ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lonewulf47 Posted November 24, 2018 Share Posted November 24, 2018 1 minute ago, mroschk said: Thanks for the fast Answer. So i think it is a questin about € to get access to the sub-database for the Holdings? (Btw: i want to say that EFB is AMAZING ) Not only but also...😃 AivlaSoft is not the contractual partner of LIDO or Jeppesen. This is the business of Navigraph and NavDataPro. We are only providing the parsers to retrieve data from the Standard ARINC 424 Database. This would require some massive changes within the parser and the whole database layout. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mroschk Posted November 24, 2018 Author Share Posted November 24, 2018 ok, but when i understand you in a right way, it is possible for a later version maybe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lonewulf47 Posted November 24, 2018 Share Posted November 24, 2018 2 minutes ago, mroschk said: ok, but when i understand you in a right way, it is possible for a later version maybe. Sorry, we can't give any commitment to that... At this moment it's not on our todo list. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mroschk Posted November 24, 2018 Author Share Posted November 24, 2018 ok, thanks a lot for your help and keep improving EFB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.