Terblanche

Sorry - a simple computer restart fixed the problem.

Did the latest version of FSUIPC broke Aivlasoft ...? It loads and show aircraft at the gate but the aircraft does not move. It seems not connected to MSFS. Also no weather is shown on the right panel.

Will you please consider to update your aircraft profiles to reflect some of the very popular payware aircraft for MSFS? Some come to mind: A310 and A300 Embraer 170, 175, 190 and 195 ATR72 series aircraft BAe 146 series Kodiak 100 Cessna 414 TBM850 It will be much appreciated if you can.

Thank you for the heads-up. °•. Also, after latest update for Client & Server there is also a XP database (and I don't even have XP) and it doesn't matter how many times you click 'DELETE' it simply won't go away. Thankfully it reads from MSFS database that is selected.

Please forgive my unconsciousness, I should have looked there first. Nothing came up after a GTN and PMS search and then it's always better to ask. 🤔

Will you be so kind to explain how to export a flightplan from the EFB to PMS GTN750 ...? Much appreciated.

Thank you Urs. I've rewritten a new data file, restarted my computer, and it seems to be fixed now. 🤞

Same on my side. FSUIPC up to date (19 May 2022 - 7.3.4) Both Server and Client up to date. serverLogfile.txt

👍 ... now I get it. Sorry it's been a loooong week and not a good Sunday but now I'm with you. I'll keep my eyes open for when there is a change in the RNAV of Queenstown and/or something weird as with KORD. In the meantime there's a zillion other airports to fly in and out of without any problems.

Thank you so much for your quick reply. All the answers make sense. The above mentioned quote however doesn't make sense to me ... ... because every month I update Aivlasoft with latest Navigraph Airac, does that mean it overrides the default database? I don't have the NavData folder installed anymore because it causes too many other problems for me. How do I then get Aivlasoft to NOT use the Navigraph database?

A few questions: I've read your 'Why are ILS approach(es) not showing?' post and it all makes perfectly sense - however - there are quite a few airports where I can't figure our why no SIDs or STARs are showing up. For example: Payware (iniBuilds) Queenstown (NZQN) has the RNAV (GNSS) (ELRUV1A) approach. In AS/EFB the ELRUV1A is available by NO RNAV approach and you can only choose a runway extension. Another example: Payware (FSDreamTeam) Chicago O'Hare (KORD) has NO SIDS or STARs available I've tried to create a database file WITH and WITHOUT NavData (Navigraph) folder but it remains the same in the EFB. The strange thing is that the FBW A320 and Asobo B787 do have all the SIDs and STARs available in their FMC and must read it from somewhere? On a different note: what makes an aircraft showing the ARC (green banana) when climbing or descending? I only see it for the TBM and CRJ although the ARC is selected down below on toolbar and the descent profile bar is showing on the right of the screen? Once again, thank you for this great piece of software and there is not a single airliner flight that this is not utilised to its full potential. Warm regards from Cape Town Terblanche

Now, why will the dev tell me that the elevation is correct ...? Will copy / paste this to him in an email. Thank for clarifying this ... and I suspect that the airports in South America have a similar problem.

That is indeed very very weird / strange ... ... and I have no idea why the two airport (FSDT and JustSim) will show up differently. I think I have the FSDT version somewhere because it came out with a discount if I remember correctly. Will install and see but I doubt if that's the problem because I encountered the same thing while flying in South America.

The last airport that I've noticed this was Basel (LFSB) where the EFB says: ELEV 24" ... but in reality the airport is at 880" This is for the JustSim scenery - BUT, I've already asked them about the elevation and they've confirmed that in their scenery it is: Elevation: Rwy 15 = 886" and Rwy 33 = 882" # I'm using the latest AIRAC release. [See attached picture]

Over the last few days I've witnessed and quite a few instances that the altitude displayed on the EFB does not correspond with the 'real' altitude of the airport. For example my last flight to Basel (LFSB) where the altitude is 880" but in the EFB it shows 24" ... Are both "navigraph-navdata" in the Community Folder -AND- the latest "AIRAC" for Aivlasoft wrong with the altitude of this airport? The other airports were mainly in South America because that's where I fly most of the time in May. I've decided to do a continent every month in all the splendour that MSFS provides.